
There's more

[T]he assertion by Republican leaders in the House that as many as a dozen of their members who were leaning toward voting for the legislation ended up voting against it because of Pelosi’s speech is extraordinary.
Let’s see if we have this straight: whichever side of the issue you were on, yesterday’s vote was considered one of the most important ones members of Congress will ever face. Many respected voices argued that an economic catastrophe might follow in the wake of its defeat. Opponents of the legislation considered it a terrible violation of free-market principles. The stakes could not be higher.
After the legislation was defeated and only one-third of House Republicans backed the plan, John Boehner and Roy Blunt took to the microphones and indicated that Pelosi’s speech had been so alienating and offensive that a significant number of House Republicans changed their mind and voted against the bill.
Can they be serious? Do they realize how foolish and irresponsible they sound? On one of the most important votes they will ever cast, insisting “the speech made me do it” is lame and adolescent. The vote, after all, was on the legislation, not the speech. And to say that a dozen members of your caucus voted not out of principle but out of pique is a terrible indictment of them. I hope we learn the names of these delicate figures whose feelings were so bruised and abused.
I have been defending House Republicans for a week against friends who thought they were acting in an irresponsible fashion. I argued they were people with admirable free-market principles who were simply trying to improve legislation and have their voices heard, something to which they were certainly entitled. And I thought they made the bill better than it was. But yesterday’s vote, and the excuses that followed the vote, have made me reassess my judgment. Watching Boehner, Blunt, and Cantor blame the outcome on the Pelosi speech was an embarrassment.
We are in one of the most dispiriting moments I have ever witnessed in Washington, when political authority seems to be collapsing all around us. House Republicans have contributed to this, and it’s a shame.

And Lunsford had previously gotten in trouble for similar happenings with VENCOR. What ISN'T mentioned is that the Elaine Chao was also on the board of VENCOR. Elaine Chao is Mitch McConnell's beard - I mean, wife! (She's also the Secretary of Labor under Dubya.)
Page 93: Many doctors would say that, in so far as it [CAM or Complementary and Alternative Medicine] takes the pressure off them to treat minor ailments, and also encourages patients to take more responsibility for their own well-being, it's on the whole a good thing. But no one is truly empowered by being given false information about his or her own health. Moreover, there is a difference between allowing consumers the freedom to make bad choices about their own treatment and allowing the boundaries of medical knowledge to be decided by the whims of the marketplace rather than by scientific research.I've been reading a succession of books about how the "marketplace" is basically changing us from citizens to consumers and the consequences (both local and global) that that has. This has become more apparent over the last eight years though has a long history. I was reminded of this this weekend when I saw a commercial for trucks (either Chevy or Ford) starring Toby Keith talking about the men and women of the country depending on these trucks on their way to the American Dream.
Suddenly I thought about the immigrants who came to this country in the 1800s and what I had read and been told was the American Dream then as opposed to now, say since the hardcore production of vehicles in the 1940s and 1950s, when the American Dream was recreated by the car companies. As though the only American Dream worth pursuing is the consumption of a car and the destruction of the earth due to the consumption of carbon-based fuels.Page 119-120: Each of these trends [the previous paragraph was a listing of statistics about the falling numbers in church attendance, political party membership, and weddings in the UK] reflects the fragmentation of traditional authority structures - churches, political parties and the two-parent family - that previous generations rarely questioned. In the words of Boston sociologist Peter Berger, society is moving inexorably 'from fate to choice'. Modernity and the marketplace dismantle all sorts of institutions, including many whose authority is implicit rather than explicit, such as publicly funded broadcasters and family-run businesses. And every change brings with it new possibilities that are both liberating and a burden. The subjective side of human experience takes over from the objective...
The disintegration of communities, the inescapable presence of electronic media, the growing influence of distant happenings on our everyday lives, the bewildering array of lifestyle options - all these factors force us to choose who we are, in a way that our grandparents never had to...
It is all very well to be given greater freedom to choose our jobs, sexual preferences, political identity, philosophy and religious beliefs, but in making those choices we first have to decide what we believe...
Our takes is not made any easier by the fact that the public institutions that previously acted as gatekeepers to intellectual orthodoxy are now telling us that we can believe more or less what we like.
Page 124: The free market likes counterknowledge. The troubled newspaper industry - all of it, not just the tabloids - increasingly relies on fascinating but untrue stories to sell papers... Countknowledge, unconstrained by inconvenient facts, enables the media to repackage real life into 'real-life dramas' and history into 'mysteries'. Fact is presented to us as entertainment - and increasingly, though we may not be aware that it is happening, entertainment is presented to us as fact.
The second was "Just How Stupid Are We? The Truth About the American Voter" to which I wrote a review on my IReads Application [sorry, this review isn't available anymore]. This also covered the need for the people to be educated - however, in this instance, Shenkman (the author) specifically talks about Civics. Check out the Just How Stupid Are We blog.
And finally my third book, Russell Banks' Dreaming Up America. This is Banks first work of nonfiction. The book is actually made of an interview that he gave for a French film delineating American History as represented by American Film (starting with the ur-racist Birth of a Nation). All three titles deal with the dangers of television: Barbarians talks extensively about the infotainment telesector. Stupid talks about the reduction of elected officials into 30 section personality spots. And Dreaming has the following quote:We've done something that has never been done. As a species we have been required to protect the young, because it takes a long time for the human child to become an adult human, longer than any other species, all in order to learn how to deal with human socialization. In ancient times, as the species evolved, we protected the young first from the weather, from the saber-toothed tigers, from the amoral forces of the universe, protected them until they were able to protect themselves. In the modern era the amoral forces of the universe are primarily economic. Thus we have all those jokes about keeping the salesman out of the house, slamming the door on the salesman's foot. This is really about protecting the young and the vulnerable, those who can't distinguish between advertisement and reality. Those jokes and cartoons implied a serious challenge by the salesman to the sanctity of the home. But when we brought the television into the home, we basically brought the salesman into the home. We brought the saber-toothed tiger into the cave and said, 'Make yourself comfortable by the fire.' And now we leave the salesman babysitting the children while we step out the door and go off to work at McDonald's and Wal-Mart.
It's a very dangerous situation: We've colonized our own children. Having run out of people on the planet to colonize, run out of people who can't distinguish between beads and trinkets and something of value, having found ourselves no longer able to swap some beads and axes for Manhattan Island, we've ended up colonizing our own children. We're now engaged in a process of auto-colonization. The old sow is eating its own farrow...
We've become the conquistadors of our own suburbs. Actually we've done it all while claiming not to know what it is that we've done. It is very possibly the end of the Republic. We're seeing something different take place now, something altogether new on this planet - a fascist plutocracy presiding over a world population of disenfranchised and distracted consumers and would-be consumers.
Page 135: In the last couple of years, counterknowledge has proved surprisingly vulnerable to guerrilla attacks from the blogosphere. Freeland defenders of empirical truth, armed to the teeth with hard data, have mounted devastating ambushed on quacks and frauds who have ventured too far into the public domain...The lives of celebrity pseudoscientists have been made an absolute misery by Bad Science, Holfordwatch, the Quackometer blog and David Colquhoun's Improbable Science website. Reputations are easily damaged in a furiously competitive market, and people rather enjoy the spectacle of smug, rich lifestyle gurus being humiliated.

September 16, 2008
The ACLU is representing two gay men in an official complaint to the Louisville Human Relations Commission after an employee at a McDonald’s restaurant in downtown Louisville called them and three friends a series of anti-gay slurs.
Ryan Marlatt, Teddy Eggers, and three other friends had stopped for lunch at the McDonald's restaurant on July 26, 2008, while visiting Louisville for the weekend. While they waited for their food to be prepared, an employee behind the counter referred to them as "faggots" to another employee. Marlatt and Eggers asked to speak with a manager. As they waited for the supervisor on duty to appear, the employee who had called them "faggots" started arguing with them, repeatedly calling them "faggots" in front of other customers and calling one of them a "cocksucker" and "bitch."

CAT/Libra (September 24 - October 23)
This air-ruled feline personifies the pedestrian notion of femininity as it used to be. Libran Cats are jolly good talkers. They waver, vacillate, and balance themselves on an eternal hot tin roof. Garbed in finery fit for royalty or better, these Cat/Libras are intangibly lovable. Though they seem weaker than others, there is tremendous strength in so feeble an appearance. People talk to them. Who could be afraid of this gentle creature? Couched behind that ready smile, ready to spring into reverse, is a wily tabby who spends gobs of time feeling people out and discovering their foibles. Neither aggressive nor harmful, Libran Cats are elusive to the nth degree. When they seem to be in one place, they suddenly are not there any longer. Then they pop up elsewhere. A Libran Cat's a mighty wary beast. This Cat's hiss, though not to be taken as lightly as we think, is much worse than his scratch.

Why are there no better pictures of this actor? Or at least some screen shots from Weeds. In the first season of Weeds, he is Alejandro, a competing drug dealer who starts pennying Nancy's car and fountain. Later they end up with a hardcore quickie in an alleyway. You get to see some nice ass.I didn't really want you, but I want you now...


From Towleroad: The Lewis and Clark Public Library in Helena, Montana held a public hearing on Tuesday night over whether the book The Joy of Gay Sex should remain on library shelves.
The book has been in the library's circulation for 15 years. A decision is expected to be made on October 21. Those in Helena would be wise to look at a recent decision made by the Nampa library to return the book to the shelves.
In other news, after ordering it MONTHS ago, LPL finally got today The Advocate Guide to Gay Men's Health and Wellness. Up until today, we'd only had a book from 1997: The Gay Men's Wellness Guide: The National Lesbian and Gay Health Association's Complete Book of Physical, Emotional and Mental Health and Well-Being for Every Gay Male.