Thursday, November 18, 2010

I Hate This Woman



Via Thomas L. Friedman at the NYT:

In case you missed it, a story circulated around the Web on the eve of President Obama’s trip that it would cost U.S. taxpayers $200 million a day — about $2 billion for the entire trip. Cooper said he felt impelled to check it out because the evening before he had had Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, a Republican and Tea Party favorite, on his show and had asked her where exactly Republicans will cut the budget.

Instead of giving specifics, Bachmann used her airtime to inject a phony story into the mainstream. She answered: “I think we know that just within a day or so the president of the United States will be taking a trip over to India that is expected to cost the taxpayers $200 million a day. He’s taking 2,000 people with him. He’ll be renting over 870 rooms in India, and these are five-star hotel rooms at the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel. This is the kind of over-the-top spending.”

First of all, Anderson apparently has a really important bill to pay, otherwise, the bitch wouldn't be on his show.

Yes. I've convinced myself, that like Parker Posey - my still reigning queen of Indie Film (Flirt, Party Girl, House of Yes, Best in Show) - who shows up in horrible movies like You've Got Mail and Blade 3 (though she as a vampire kicks seven kinds of ass) because she has a bill to pay, Anderson Cooper would not let the worse thing to come out of Minnesota since The Codependent No More book-on-tape read by author Melody Beattie, dontcha know, onto his show. *Shakes fist vehemently at CNN for turning into such a crap news channel.

However...

The next night, Cooper explained that he felt compelled to trace that story back to its source, since someone had used his show to circulate it. His research, he said, found that it had originated from a quote by “an alleged Indian provincial official,” from the Indian state of Maharashtra, “reported by India’s Press Trust, their equivalent of our A.P. or Reuters. I say ‘alleged,’ provincial official,” Cooper added, “because we have no idea who this person is, no name was given.”

“It was an anonymous quote,” said Cooper. “Some reporter in India wrote this article with this figure in it. No proof was given; no follow-up reporting was done. Now you’d think if a member of Congress was going to use this figure as a fact, she would want to be pretty darn sure it was accurate, right? But there hasn’t been any follow-up reporting on this Indian story. The Indian article was picked up by The Drudge Report and other sites online, and it quickly made its way into conservative talk radio.”

Cooper then added: “Again, no one really seemed to care to check the facts. For security reasons, the White House doesn’t comment on logistics of presidential trips, but they have made an exception this time." He then quoted Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, as saying, “I am not going to go into how much it costs to protect the president, [but this trip] is comparable to when President Clinton and when President Bush traveled abroad. This trip doesn’t cost $200 million a day.” Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, said: “I will take the liberty this time of dismissing as absolutely absurd, this notion that somehow we were deploying 10 percent of the Navy and some 34 ships and an aircraft carrier in support of the president’s trip to Asia. That’s just comical. Nothing close to that is being done.”

Cooper also pointed out that, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the entire war effort in Afghanistan was costing about $190 million a day and that President Bill Clinton’s 1998 trip to Africa — with 1,300 people and of roughly similar duration, cost, according to the Government Accountability Office and adjusted for inflation, “about $5.2 million a day.”

When widely followed public figures feel free to say anything, without any fact-checking, we have a problem. It becomes impossible for a democracy to think intelligently about big issues — deficit reduction, health care, taxes, energy/climate — let alone act on them. Facts, opinions and fabrications just blend together. But the carnival barkers that so dominate our public debate today are not going away — and neither is the Internet. All you can hope is that more people will do what Cooper did — so when the next crazy lie races around the world, people’s first instinct will be to doubt it, not repeat it.

Thank you, Thomas L. Friedman!

6 comments:

Kyle said...

Though I'd like that last line to be true JP, I think that would be underestimating the stupidity and laziness of human beings.

gp said...

If A.C. were doing his job, he'd have demanded that his "guest" cite the sources for her insane assertion. It's disgusting that interviewers constantly let outrageous lies get spread on their shows.

Writer said...

Kyle, I agree, but I think in reference to people who are in the media, this is what should be expected. The stupidty and laziness of human beings in general and people in the U.S. specificially is why the forefathers created the kind of government they did - they were protecting us from ourselves. LOL :)

Writer said...

gp, it is both outrageous and way too common.

JamTheCat said...

Too bad this is the exception to today's rule of "stenographing" instead of "reporting."

Writer said...

There's very little good reporting on TV today - it's all so sensational and loud and screaming. Rachel Maddow (despite her faults) is probably the best and though I like Keith Olbermann, he's totally over the top and needs to quit with the Good Night and Good Luck at the end of his show. Murrow he ain't!